🔗 Share this article

The future president of the prestigious debating society has been removed from his position after failing a no-confidence vote that came after his disputed online comments about Charlie Kirk.

The motion against the student leader achieved the required super-majority to oust him from his position, according to an announcement from the society.

Contentious Posts

The dispute began after Mr Abaraonye reportedly shared messages on social media that seemed to welcome the killing of Charlie Kirk, who was shot dead while speaking at a university in Utah.

According to sources, one social media message reportedly read "Charlie Kirk got shot loool" - using an extended form of the acronym for 'laughing out loud'.

The president-elect is also said to have posted in a messaging group with fellow students seeming to welcome the incident.

Vote Outcome

The no-confidence motion took place over the recent days, with results announced on Tuesday.

Society announcements indicated that over twelve hundred votes were cast in favor of no confidence, while just over five hundred were against the motion.

The notice confirmed that the future president was considered to have stepped down in following the Oxford Union's rules.

Procedural Disputes

Voting operations were temporarily halted early on the previous day after the election official was reportedly subjected to "obstruction, intimidation, and unwarranted hostility" from multiple individuals.

In a response, Mr Abaraonye claimed that the vote tally had been halted because electoral officials believed "no legitimate and true result could be reached as a result of process errors".

His response unequivocally denied that any person acting for the student had participated in threatening or obstructive conduct.

Continuing Controversy

The student maintained that significant concerns had been submitted to the disciplinary committee and that he remained the elected leader.

His statement added that George was "proud and thankful to have the support of significantly more than half of university members" who supported a "secure voting process and resist attempts to subvert democracy".

Critics have argued that any failure to remove him would "signal to the world that the society has chosen ideology over integrity".

External Reactions

On recently, Kirk's former chief of staff read out an open letter to the Oxford Union on a related program broadcast.

The message criticized the society of becoming a institution where "presidents of the union publicly celebrate the assassination of a ideological rival".

The communication indicated that if the student were to remain in post, supporters would "directly reach out to every American political speaker who has ever spoken at the society and advise them against future participation".

The Oxford Union had previously criticized the student's remarks after Kirk's death and confirmed that concerns filed against him had been referred for official review.

The student leader had been one of multiple members to debate with Kirk at the union in spring.